Nice site. Yep, making your own theme fitting your needs is actually how Zenphoto is best used.

A great site on nature photography, painting. He is a Canadian artist, with a passion for nature, and a great eye.

http://kevinturino.com

Don't be afraid to post a comment or two ;-)

Well, sorry, that site is not valid for the showcase gallery for obvious reasons.

Hello !
Here's my site :
http://www.s-ailleurs.com
And thanks a lot for ZP !...

Apparently no one reads the showcase minimum requirements....

Just fresh & made with that wonderful zenphoto stuff:
http://1plus1photographes.com

Nice. Some quick comments if you allow: You might want to reconsider the menu on the front page, really barely readable with most images. Also, the prev/next images on the albums are not really clear in their function until you happen to click on them... (I personally don't like that I don't see if there are 100 or just 10 images coming btw.)

After a fresh overhaul of the server:

http://inthemdl.net/

Facebook meets Zenphoto, meets me.

http://www.socalbavarians.com

Photos from San Diego Bmw CCA Events

Invalid submission as again not matching the most basic requirements...

I hope you like it: Berlin Pictures.

hello

a few months ago (9 months), I have noticed that the url for Nicolas Dory (78/224) was wrong.

The problem is still remain : the right url should be http://www.nicolasdory.com/fr and actually, the wrong url is http://www.morelfotografie.nl/

Thanks, I have fixed it (not sure why that still was wrong).

hello

some major improvements for:
http://www.alicefranco.com/photography/

very fun to play with ZP

thank you

All right, I have updated the entry.

http://augustusfoto.de/

I just modified the default "light" theme and added fancybox (with jquery).

I would call it focused. Smarter und shorter to get full image view. Additional more impressive album preview...

Nice one, will be added soon. [i]Smarter und shorter to get full image view. [/i] Has its advantages and disadvantages (does not work without js, can't be linked directly and there is no image page search engines can catalog).

(PS: As a German site your site requires an impressum)

http://www.faceroam.com

acrylian, according to your last post: impressum in germany is only needed, if you publicate this service / website / web-content as your usual business or for related stuff...

so not if it is only for private use :)

you´r right with its advantages and disadvantages, in my case it is better that way. i will improve the theme sometime again and give it to you as open source, if its interesting for others.

Regarding impressum you are not correctly informed. It is true that a private site does not require an impressum but a site viewable by the public is not generally considered private. you would have to password protect the entire site to achieve that. What you refer to is the commercial/non commerical thing but that does not always matter.
Since you are basically representing your photography works with surely some commercial thoughts in mind you should really have an impressum to be on the secure side (you surely know about the "sport of Abmahnungen"). The law and jurisdiction is not exact in this. And it does not hurt if you maybe want to get hired for photography...:-)

See also here:
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impressumspflicht#Keine_Impressumspflicht
http://www.telemedien-und-recht.de/#a12
http://www.bmj.bund.de/enid/Handels-_und_Wirtschaftsrecht/Anbieterkennzeichnungspflicht_im_Internet_1ht.html
http://www.e-recht24.de/artikel/datenschutz/209.html