![]() |
|
Curious why pagination was set to noindex, nofollow in 1.6.2 when Google seems to say otherwise? - Printable Version +- ZenphotoCMS Forum (https://forum.zenphoto.org) +-- Forum: Support (https://forum.zenphoto.org/forum-1.html) +--- Forum: General support (https://forum.zenphoto.org/forum-4.html) +--- Thread: Curious why pagination was set to noindex, nofollow in 1.6.2 when Google seems to say otherwise? (/thread-13925.html) |
Curious why pagination was set to noindex, nofollow in 1.6.2 when Google seems to say otherwise? - J_C - 15-03-2024 In the latest 1.6.2, I’m confused by the default changes to Paginated pages are set to noindex and nofollow, when Google does use them.
Google says it indexes paginated pages, as long as they are setup using `` tags.
Support is also added for `` when Google no longer uses it.
Also for
Again, I don’t see any clear guidance on this. I see some old SEO advice saying not to do it, but plenty of other posts and SEO sites saying it is fine to include paginated pages. It looks like it started with this bug report. I know that the defaults can be changed, and they seem to work, so this is not a real issue. More just curious on why it was done? Curious why pagination was set to noindex, nofollow in 1.6.2 when Google seems to say otherwise? - acrylian - 15-03-2024 The exclusion of paginated pages by default was indeed a mistake. It was sometimes said due to the changing contents of paginated pages this can cause trouble. Google has a hard time (in my observation) to properly index sites that change a lot or even daily. prev/next is not supported by google but it may still be an indicator. And I don't know perhaps other search engines - unbelieveable but there is more than google ;-) - do or even assistive tools may use it). Regarding sitemaps I actually followed what a very widely used SEO plugin for a very widely used CMS does. But for different needs options to enable/disable were added. Curious why pagination was set to noindex, nofollow in 1.6.2 when Google seems to say otherwise? - kuzzzma - 19-04-2024 Finally got to this topic & checking html_meta_tags settings and code. For SEO it may make sense to limit indexing and serving paginated pages in search results in favour of actual albums/images/pages/news items, as they will be available on permanent basis (for example, news item will eventually move to a new page in news category as you add more stuff) + it helps with a problem of duplicate content. The problem is including nofollow too - it prevents robots from using those paginated pages to discover new links to actual photos/albums/news/pages, which we actually want to happen ALWAYS. Also description for this setting doesn't mention nofollow, which is misleading. Curious why pagination was set to noindex, nofollow in 1.6.2 when Google seems to say otherwise? - acrylian - 19-04-2024 We changed the default option to enabled already in 1.6.3a which of course does not change anything for existing usages. Good point about the nofollow actually. Will remove that. Curious why pagination was set to noindex, nofollow in 1.6.2 when Google seems to say otherwise? - acrylian - 20-04-2024 I have reworked html_meta_tags once again regarding this in 1.6.3a. The options are now renamed and now are opt-in for disallowing indexing and also set a proper "noindex, follow" in that case. Also I added - inspired by the Paradigm theme - some options for search and some common static custom pages. |