![]() |
|
Next version: use jQuery? - Printable Version +- ZenphotoCMS Forum (https://forum.zenphoto.org) +-- Forum: Support (https://forum.zenphoto.org/forum-1.html) +--- Forum: General support (https://forum.zenphoto.org/forum-4.html) +--- Thread: Next version: use jQuery? (/thread-1742.html) |
Next version: use jQuery? - Null - 2007-11-01 Hi, Well is it even in consideration to switch to jQuery and drop prototype and scriptaculous? Or is there a way to switch over myself? I am not a fan of prototype or scriptaculous and rather use jQuery how do you guys think of this? Greetz Next version: use jQuery? - aitf311 - 2007-11-01 We do have jquery in 1.1 and I think we could save quite a bit of space if we did switch over but thats a lot of work. Next version: use jQuery? - trisweb - 2007-11-01 Not tons of work -- I am planning to do it. The only things we use Scriptaculous for right now are drag-'n-drop sorting and fade effects. jQuery and the interface library can handle those even better, so I want to switch. jQuery rocks Next version: use jQuery? - Null - 2007-11-02 Great to hear!!! Glad you guys like jQeury better too. So next version "the switch"? Or put it in the trac when planned? Can't wait for this... Greetz Next version: use jQuery? - aitf311 - 2007-11-02 Yea, the next version will have the switch. But ZenPhoto is a community project, if you figure it out on your own you are always welcome to post it in the forum or trac. Next version: use jQuery? - gerrys0 - 2007-11-02 General question: I currently use Prototype (and Scriptaculous to a certain extent - though I have no use for fancy fading and sliding - I just change the page). What are the big advantages of JQuery over Prototype? Enough for me to change my Javascript in all my work? Next version: use jQuery? - aitf311 - 2007-11-02 Well a lot of the things are arguable, but its the easiest to write for, the easiest to extend, and the fastest, among other things like a UI Really old, but still relevant: http://jquery.com/blog/2006/08/20/why-jquerys-philosophy-is-better/ |