done, done, done, and done. Submitting.

The submission is not supported by reliable sources, so I changed some of the links into references. However, all the references point to the zenphoto.org domain. Can anybody imagine any "reliable" source other than this website?

Sorry, all known resources like articles about Zenphoto or tutorials are listed on the article I mentioned. I do monitor the web and search but there is just not much. But if I look at other gallery entries they don't really have that much more actually.

The are no articles on "big tech sites" or something, at least I didn't find any. There are a lot of the "best x photo galleries" type of article who all copy themselves so I doubt they are a good reference.

A lot of hosts offer Zenphoto hosting and have pages for that (often using our texts naturallly), so I am not sure they will be considered valid.

This conversion occurred on the wikipedia IRC channel:

http://wklej.org/id/808487/txt/

Apparently, zenphoto needs an original source that is *not* on www.zenphoto.org . Furthermore, there are thousands of articles about software that aren't supposed to exist.

Well, too bad, but I can understand why they do it. This is actually like it is done in sicience publications and their goal is of course to stand as one. Which they don't right now because of the mixted quality of articles. Anyway, their site, their rules.

I guess as long as we are at least on the comparison page we will just have to live with this then.

Thanks for looking into this for us!

Too bad indeed. I feel like there needs to be another wikipedia for software.

Is there?

I have no idea.